|
|||||||||||||||
The intent of this document is to describe the In Situ behavioral simulation/model testbed project with regards to:
The reasons for this sort of project description is to, among other things,
Also see the About page.
<project mission, purpose, goals (specific, measureable, resourcebound, timebound)>
Our goal is to get every single person who has a reason to evaluate simulations against real data to either use our system, or else to use one of the direct competitors, whom we hope our work will create. All we care about is market size, not market share. If we convert 100% of the potential users into users and they all defect to some future competitor's software that incorporates the right sort of principles, we win. It's not our evaluation technique against someone else's. It's evaluating simulations versus doing nothing. We are not trying to gain market share, we are trying to win converts.
<motivation for the project>
<work to be done: services/products provided; funding; relevant experience; success measures>
<addresses; owners; organization structure; prior art/products>
<who cares: what industry(ies), professions, etc.>
Psychologists, AI and CS folk, not to mention AL folk, engineers, philosophers, anthropologists, cognitive scientists, neural networkers, and so on.
<number who care: static, growing, shrinking?>
<what is happening to industry/professions that will affect those who might care about our products/services, and their ability to adopt/use our products/services>
<who are current and potential clients/users?>
Psychologists, AI and CS folk, not to mention AL folk, engineers, philosophers, anthropologists, cognitive scientists, neural networkers, and so on, who might potentially evaluate their theory, methods, experimental results, models, etc.
<how many folks are there who might ever find this stuff useful, and what percentage might we convince to use our stuff or to collaborate?>
What we have is 150,000+ psychologists, plus Lord knows how many AI and CS folk, not to mention AL folk, engineers, philosophers, anthropologists, cognitive scientists, neural networkers, and so on. They divide roughly into two groups.
Group One: those who dont care about computer simulation and have committed their lives to an intellectual establishment with a fifty-year commitment to a methodological dogma that effectively prohibits evaluating any computational model against any data.
Group Two: those who love simulating stuff and don't want their fun spoiled by checking it against reality. Marketing to those two groups, we have Russ Church, you, me, and Dave Eckerman, so far. If we charge a nickel, or even a penny, to use InSitu, that gives one more of those close to a quarter million folks worldwide an excuse to sit still and do nothing.
<SubSection Content Goes Here>
<SubSection Content Goes Here>
<SubSection Content Goes Here>
<SubSection Content Goes Here>
<SubSection Content Goes Here>
|
|||||||||
|
Copyright © 2003 Steve Kemp, et al., Some rights reserved. Last modified on: |